What's new

The thread where Raz shares some of his knowledge

Razulian

The Mad Scientist
Lesson #1: The link between getting sick and being social

Everyone gets sick, and it's general knowledge that people get sick faster during winter. But why?
To get sick a virus has to enter your body, and most of the time a virus comes from another person (or animal).
Let's take rhinoviruses for instance, they primarily cause the common cold.
The rhinovirus is transmitted by ways of contact, which means you could catch a cold when you're close to someone who has it.
This happens with many other virusses too.
But how come it happens a lot more during winter?

Let's say dad got the virus from his son while they both were watching TV in the living room, and the son got it from someone else at school while playing inside (it was freezing outside so even at school they stayed in).
To make matters worse nobody refreshed the air in the rooms because they didn't want a cold room.
In turn the air in the rooms would get more and more poluted.

During summer they are all further away from each other (dad is working in the garage for instance, the son is playing in the garden) and the windows in the rooms are open to let in fresh air and thus there's not much chance that the rooms are poluted with the rhinovirus.

So in short, during winter people are closer to each other and the virus spreads faster than in summer.


Logically, if you're social then there's a higher chance that you'll get a virus from someone else, especially during winter.
If you're not that social then chances are that you won't get sick that fast.


For example:
During vacations I never get sick because there's hardly any way the virus can reach me (I hardly see anyone during my time off :p).
Only when I go to school I get sick, this is because I take the bus (or rather took, as I've fixed my bicycle two weeks ago) or one of my more social classmates catched the cold.
Since I'm going by bike now I probably won't get sick that fast, and I'm going to take some steps away from my classmates too when one of them is sick.

One thing I should note:
-The immune system doesn't perform worse during cold temperatures (except when you get hypothermia, but then most of your body's core systems perform slower than usual). So don't be discouraged of driving your bike in the rain, it's still better than the bus if you don't want to get sick.




I'll keep adding more stuff when I think of something interesting, if anyone wants to know something then just ask. I know many things.
BECAUSE: SCIENCE!
 
That's an interesting treatise. How do you factor in the immune system into that equation? It stands to reason that a more social person would have a more robust immune system capable of fighting off bugs that might seriously harm a recursive person that is forced into contact with germs more suddenly. Also, proper hygiene such as using germicides throughout the day can cut your chances of infection way down, while still allowing for social contact.

Here's my question for Raz: Is time travel possible? If so, could one travel back and forth through time, or would it be a one way trip?
 
That's an interesting treatise. How do you factor in the immune system into that equation? It stands to reason that a more social person would have a more robust immune system capable of fighting off bugs that might seriously harm a recursive person that is forced into contact with germs more suddenly. Also, proper hygiene such as using germicides throughout the day can cut your chances of infection way down, while still allowing for social contact.


That second part is a myth. I'd say it's untrue because of immunogenetics (the field of medical research that explores the relationship between genetics and the immune system).I've got a pretty good immune system from what I can tell, I don't get sick as fast as the person next to me who is quite a bit more social but I still can get sick.
And yup, using germicides isn't bad though many people don't use it.


Here's my question for Raz: Is time travel possible? If so, could one travel back and forth through time, or would it be a one way trip?
You wouldn't believe how many times I get that question. lol

Time for lesson #2

Lesson #2: Is it possible to go faster than light? Err--- I mean is time travel possible?
Travelling into the future is definitely possible, cryostasis. You wouldn't know what was happening around you as you and your mind would be totally frozen. But others around you would know it. So if you'd be unfrozen after some time you'd be as if you awoke in the future (which would have actually happened then).
I haven't yet seen cryostasis for real so I'm not sure about this one :p


But going back in time is another story, and in my opinion impossible as time only flows one way (it's called the arrow of time, or entropy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_(arrow_of_time)).
Here's a really good example of why (I'm not going to retype it, as this is what I tell most people): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_(arrow_of_time)#An_example_of_apparent_irreversibility
Some scientists say that if you could go faster than light then you might be able to, but even to reach the speed of light you'd need an infinite amount of energy so I don't think that it's possible.
 
This is what my mind replaced your whole post with when I saw the ending of the post.

Lesson #3? Lesson #3.

Lesson #3: What came first? Chicken or the egg?
What came first? The dinosaur or egg?
What came first? The fish or the egg?
What came first? You or the egg-cell?

Let me make it easier for you:
What came first? The sperm or the egg-cell?

It matters, which one was produced first? Was the sperm produced at 5 AM and the egg-cell a couple of days ago? Then it's the egg-cell, could be the other way too though.

In short: both came at the same time.


EDIT: didn't expect that, did you? :p

EDIT2: I'm saying that the sperm is the chicken because it moves by itself, you can see it swimming. The egg cell doesn't swim so it's just th egg.
 
Dire's thoughts:

1. Largely true. It is statistically possible to be infected with a virus from one particle, but also very unlikely. Getting multiple different strains of a Rhinovirus at the same time CAN make it worse, depending on how the viruses interact. Don't assume you're immune just because you already have a cold. Rhinoviruses can stick around on surfaces for 1-2 days, much less in direct sunlight. Be much more wary of infected people coughing, sneezing or touching things that you interact with (especially your hands) than simply breathing air in the same room. You're much more likely to be infected from a surface than breathing, but it's still possible.

2. If traveling between different universes is possible, a form of functional time travel may be possible, however, assuming an infinite number of universes, it would be impossible to travel to the right one (or even one where life can exist). Of course, time travel might well be possible in universes with different physics systems.

3. I disagree with your definitions. All that needs to have been said has been said.
 
Dire's thoughts:

1. Largely true. It is statistically possible to be infected with a virus from one particle, but also very unlikely. Getting multiple different strains of a Rhinovirus at the same time CAN make it worse, depending on how the viruses interact. Don't assume you're immune just because you already have a cold. Rhinoviruses can stick around on surfaces for 1-2 days, much less in direct sunlight. Be much more wary of infected people coughing, sneezing or touching things that you interact with (especially your hands) than simply breathing air in the same room. You're much more likely to be infected from a surface than breathing, but it's still possible.

2. If traveling between different universes is possible, a form of functional time travel may be possible, however, assuming an infinite number of universes, it would be impossible to travel to the right one (or even one where life can exist). Of course, time travel might well be possible in universes with different physics systems.

3. I disagree with your definitions. All that needs to have been said has been said.

For 3:
Always matters the point of view, I'm looking at it in the way that the chicken seed grows inside the egg, as in you need both to get the final product. But if you look at it literally then yes, the egg came first.


For 2: If different universes exist, then there should be an infinite amount. The Big Bang happened at random remember? If it happened once, it most likely happened again. Or you just have one universe that repeats itself over and over. Space keeps expanding and at some point every star or object will disappear, and another big bang could happen in this universe which causes everything to repeat.
Both are just theories so we can't be sure.

For 1: I should add that Rhinoviruses mutate pretty fast, so if you become immune to the version pre-mutation you won't be immune to the version post-mutation. (Source: http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhinovirus Dutch wiki page)
 
Top Bottom