Menu
By:
Filters
What's new

RP GAMES The Resistance (beta 1.0)

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's it I'm toast. Doesn't matter who did it, I will be blamed for my damn good looks. Who could successfully complete a mission when distracted by my sexy-ness. But seriously... WHO DID IT cause now I am determined to use this on you:

Oi5nZqa.png


BTW what was the mission? Tell em what they didn't win Alex!
 
Man could Kis even be a spy? Come on she didn't even know what Steam was...

Hmm Dire explaining strategy means he might know the strategy, I blame him then!

Hmm there is strategy in this game, I blame T1g then.

Hmmm there are radios in this game? Kel must be using it to listen to Beiber while he steals our damn loot, I blame him!

No but seriously, I don't know who done it and where they done it and what they done it with, if anything I am just more fucking confused as to what the hell we are doing and how the hell I even got signed up for this game lol
 
Hmmm... one successful mission (Yay resistance!), one failed (Boo spies!)... or is that Boo yah?! ;)
Tristan is right... I don't know what Steam is, how could I possibly NOT fail a mission then? Does that mean I am a spy?
But, if I am a spy, I would want to go on a mission, right? So I could fail it? Or am I so fail, that even though I succeeded with a failed mission that I did not succeed in partaking in that I inadvertently failed the resistance making the spies more successful?

All I know is that one of the two spies could have 'known' that the other would successfully fail that last mission while failing to show they too were a spy by successfully voting YAY not NAY.

Are you confused? I am. ;) But I have explained myself successfully and did not fail to answer Dire's question!
 
I love it. Accusations going fast and furious. So for the record I am saying I am not the spy. Like dire said that rings hollow because a spy would say the same thing.

Here is what I know: Tristan or Dire is a spy cause this mission failed. Keleynel COULD be a spy and voted yes to throw us off.

Dire is working hard to seem like he is figuring it out for the resistance, It could be real or it could be a higher meta game to throw us all off.
Tristan is a meta gamer too so his conduct in the thread and related threads could go either way.
Kismet hasn't done anything to say which side she is on for me.
Kel is slightly suspicious to me because of the no vote for the team to go through. Although that could be just having fun with the game.

Dire, I would think it is a better strategy to put Kel and Kis on the next team so since we know at least one spy is on the team that just failed.
 
I agree with your assessments against everyone but what do you think of the 'choosing self' for the mission strategy? Because I still think it's a good idea overall - it seemed to work for Kel in the first round assuming neither of you were faking it - I maintain that if a spy revealed themselves in the first two man vote it would be a strategically bad idea. If the two-man mission (including mission director) succeeds, great, if it fails - you can have a pretty good idea of who the spy is at least...

So that's my current thinking. Myself plus ??? for the next mission. I'll decide which other person based on what people post here unless you can convince sending someone other than me is a good idea. I'll admit it, it's going to be hard to convince me to trust someone else more then me...
 
I voted against the mission because it had a 100% chance of having at least one spy. Since I knew that going in, there was no new information to be gained from this mission unless both spies were on it and were foolish enough to both vote no.

I also hoped that another Resistance member would be in the same logic boat as me and also vote against it. I would then feel more apt to trust that person. Obviously, I did not want to voice this logic beforehand, since I would risk spies voting against it just to gain my trust.

Alas, neither came to fruition and I am back where I started before the mission began: among Tr1age, T1G, and Dire, at least one is a spy.

As far as Kismet's choice in teams, the second mission seemed doomed to fail regardless, unless you are lucky enough to pick all 3 Resistance members. Kismet didn't even try to do that (assuming she is in the Resistance). However, I think she is as likely to do something completely random as she is strategic.

With no real new data, I still need to suspect everyone, and since all 3 of our known suspects are the last to pick teams, at least more mission is sure to fail.

I implore the other Resistance members to put me back on a team, especially the next one since it would force the spy to either reveal themselves or let the mission succeed.
 
Here's another point for consideration: Jia was pretty hurried putting the teams together and getting the game going once everyone signed up. To make it easy, he made the mission choosing order the same as the join order.

What if he took a similar shortcut in choosing the spies and resistance members? For example, every other person. That would make me, Dire, and Tristan Resistance members and Kismet and T1G spies. Very possible, and I think a more likely scenario than Jia using an RNG for teams. It would also have the effect of every other mission team chosen by a spy or Resistance member, a "fair" set up from a GM view.
 
Keleynal said:
since all 3 of our known suspects are the last to pick teams, at least more mission is sure to fail.
Click to expand...

((Not necessarily, you can still boycott their team picks, provided that the majority votes "no" - in which case the team leadership moves on to the next person.
Once a team has been proposed, you always have the option to make a case for voting against it.))
 
Jia said:
((Not necessarily, you can still boycott their team picks, provided that the majority votes "no" - in which case the team leadership moves on to the next person.
Once a team has been proposed, you always have the option to make a case for voting against it.))
Click to expand...
Perhaps, but up til now there has been a complete lack of willingness to vote against a mission, even though everyone knew there was at least 1 spy on it. We have got to stop maintaining the status quo because the status in NOT quo!
 
Keleynal said:
Here's another point for consideration: Jia was pretty hurried putting the teams together and getting the game going once everyone signed up. To make it easy, he made the mission choosing order the same as the join order.

What if he took a similar shortcut in choosing the spies and resistance members? For example, every other person. That would make me, Dire, and Tristan Resistance members and Kismet and T1G spies. Very possible, and I think a more likely scenario than Jia using an RNG for teams.
Click to expand...

((I took five cards, two black ones (for the Spies), three red ones (for the Resistance), and shuffled them thoroughly. Then I laid them down in front of me, one by one, assigning the first one to you, the second one to Kismet, and so on.))
 
Dire and Kel it is! I'll need everyone's votes on Dire's team pick, though you can feel free to hold back your vote until you've discussed Dire's proposal.
 
As far as I'm concerned, I'm either affirming Kel as resistance or calling his bluff as a spy. I'm reasonably confident T1G isn't a spy too, so if this works out we may have a path to victory...

Any questions?
 
I'm good with it. If we were 2 games up, I might have been more in favor of a riskier choice to try to flush out another spy, but I think a safe move is the best move here.
 
Keleynal said:
I'm good with it. If we were 2 games up, I might have been more in favor of a riskier choice to try to flush out another spy, but I think a safe move is the best move here.
Click to expand...

Are you serious? This makes me think Kel is 100% a spy or just a really bad judge of character. I feel like we are putting a possible two spy team together here. I also would say this if the choice was T1G and Kel. Kismet unless grew some serious deviousness overnight didn't not pick herself because she is a spy. Kel was the ONLY no vote, which while his reasoning sounds good, I still don't like it. It sounds to martyr. blah we will see I suppose. But get serious people look at the raw data!

T1G myself and Dire failed on a mission.
Kel voted NO
Dire then CHOSE Kel to play with him.

Spys can be talking behind our backs, and this match up seems extremely suspicious to me. So either Dire believes Kel is innocent because of what he said or t1g is in cahoots with Kel or Dire to get him to look like the "good guy".

I don't trust you people! lol((hates losing FYI))
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom