What's new

Media "Leaks" are bullshit

tr1age

Administrator
Staff member
Amazing: http://x-surface.tumblr.com/post/41282771026/x-surface-dont-believe-everything-you-read

  • X-Surface: Don’t believe everything you read.

    I am a gamer. I don’t work for Microsoft.
    I, like most other gamers, am sick of seeing endless rumours and speculation citing “anonymous sources” or “insiders” with no evidence, no proof, no guarantee that they’ve been fact-checked or can be relied on.
    The games industry is the only one I can think of that will quite happily publish guesswork as news. So-called ‘analysts’ are no different - they make money by guessing. They’re about as much use as a ‘source’ as I am.
    So let’s see how easy it is to be a ‘source’.

    At 1:41am GMT today I sent out an email to a bunch of gaming sites claiming to be a Microsoft employee working on the new Xbox.
    I made up every single word of it along with a couple of specs copied from other rumours that have been appearing on the Internet.
    This was a bit of an experiment to see just how easy it is to get a fake story taken seriously. And it is shockingly easy in the games industry.
    The outbox of my anonymous email account:

    The full email:

    By 9:58am GMT, it was already ‘in the news’.

    Pocket-Lint.com were the first to run with the news, almost exactly one hour after saying “we have to make an effort to validate”; two hours before I got the chance to reply. It was posted with zero validation, no fact-checking, no source information. Just a simple email basically saying “I work for Microsoft - believe me?”.
    I feel bad for lying, but it proves the point very well.
    The spread begins.

    And this is where we come to the most important part: it’s not just that it was easy to get a site to publish the non-news… it’s also the fact that every other site will then leech the information. As if linking to the original site absolves them of the need to check up on the sources.
    Not to mention the Chinese whisper effect. I have listed below many different links to sites that took this news from Pocket-Lint.com: have a read through each one and play spot the difference. There is always at least one bit of information that was changed, mistranslated (even on English sites) or not mentioned at all.
    This is no way to run a ‘news’ website. How would people react if they found out the BBC got all their news third-hand from a copied article that had been changed twice along the way? It is not reliable. No other industry works like this. Why do we accept it on gaming sites?
    At the time of writing, my fake news is appearing on major sites such as:
    Yahoo
    CNET
    Gizmodo
    Venturebeat
    Tech Digest
    VG247
    NowGamer
    And many more. This Google search shows the global reach this non-news has been getting over the past 6 hours (at the time of writing).
    This is not journalism.

    Many games ‘journalists’ have no right calling themselves such things. The vast majority do nothing but copy & paste from other sites, and will willingly publish information without fact checking a single thing or attempting to verify the source.
    It’s all about being first. To get such news out (whether you believe it or not) before any other publication does, will guarantee you page impressions, and that all-important advertising revenue. Gaming ‘journalism’ is completely broken.
    By tagging a post with ‘rumour’, most writers/editors believe they can get away with spreading false information for their own benefits. They are the only ones to gain from such practices, whilst the gaming fans end up with speculation and, sometimes, outright lies.
    TL;DR - Until Microsoft/Sony announce something: don’t believe even the most reputable gaming sites.
 
Nothing makes me rage quite as much as the state of gaming "journalism." I know that facts aren't always correct and things can be misconstrued, but this is ridiculous. This, coupled with the end of The MMO Report, has me feeling really pessimistic about the future of gaming news. How much effort does it take to check for a source? And it isn't as if having a credible, serious site devoted to gaming news isn't financially viable. In fact, it seems as if the demand for one is pretty high. Why no one has capitalized on that market is a mystery to me.

And don't even get me started on the "review" system in gaming journalism...
 
And you made it look easy. This made my day reading through all the sites and comments. News spreads so damn fast!
 
The words journalism and journalist have lost their meaning in the 21st century. Any keyboard cowboy with a topic on their mind is considered to be a journalist.

I think an attributing factor to "journalist's" willingness to post baseless articles and rumors is the possibility of being behind the curve with their direct competitors. If you're 1 of 10 blogs that covers a topic and the other 9 have posted about a rumor floating around... it's perceived that being on par with your competitors immediately outweighs your own integrity. A perfect example would be if you follow a handful of blogs that cover the same topic on twitter. If something new is announced, rumor or otherwise, it trickles through literally every one of them, each one sourcing each other.

A valuable thought process is to take virtually everything you read online with a grain of salt.
 
So what was the point of that? It's easy to perpetuate a hoax? Was the writer telling the truth about lying or lying about lying?

If you are running a gaming news site (or any news site, for that matter that doesn't report life and death, politically relevant or reputationally relevant news) and a hot tip comes in, you can either ignore it because it may be incorrect, potentially missing out on increased traffic to your website, or publish it with a disclaimer like:

"Naturally, when a tipster is anonymous, there is some degree of trepidation attached to believing what they say verbatim. However, considering the facts Pocket-lint has been given, and the lack of outlandish claims, everything our source says is plausible."-Yahoo

The tip was accepted in good faith, which is a reasonable amount of certainty for a story such as this which really has nothing more than rumor fodder to offer, true or not.

The writer of the hoax has made just as much an ass of himself as he has the tech blogs. I hope his immaturity doesn't discourage the blogs for taking a little bit of risk in publishing the best information they can find, even if it isn't independently verified.
 
Lost Humanity 18 is another very telling article about the dismal state of games journalism. The article has been censored and its author fired, and Kotaku (for example) outright refused to cover it.

Journalists don't have the luxury to accept things on good faith. They're obligated to check facts and verify sources. Nowadays, journalists of all stripes care more about being first than being right.
 
If your site is devoted to reporting rumors, as most game and tech sites are, I don't think you have much burden to verify your rumors, especially if you clearly state in the article "these are unverified rumors from an anonymous source."

Consumer, beware, and be Aware of what you are reading.
 
Top Bottom