Diremongoose
iSpy
Absolutely not. It is in the resistance's interest to band together and be open with who you trust.
One of the reasons you are suspicious is because you go against objectively good advice, regardless of who says it. I believe Psionic is a spy, but you know why he posts logically sensible things? Because anyone could come to the same conclusion, and thus anyone who points a finger and says "Ignore him, he's a spy!" looks like they have an alternate agenda.
Kel doesn't trust me at all, but he used my method for discussing who he thinks is a spy. This is the sort of level headed thinking we need.
Or do you see a flaw in a group-sourced team? Explain to me how you think open communication is a bad idea for resistance.
One of the reasons you are suspicious is because you go against objectively good advice, regardless of who says it. I believe Psionic is a spy, but you know why he posts logically sensible things? Because anyone could come to the same conclusion, and thus anyone who points a finger and says "Ignore him, he's a spy!" looks like they have an alternate agenda.
Kel doesn't trust me at all, but he used my method for discussing who he thinks is a spy. This is the sort of level headed thinking we need.
Or do you see a flaw in a group-sourced team? Explain to me how you think open communication is a bad idea for resistance.