What's new

The 'Gay'mer

Am I missing something....

I swear I wrote this:


AltTabMe was built with a VERY strict No Tolerance Policy for all of this. Why? Because we truly believe that a gamer can love games, play games, and still be mature, open, accepting, and not project their own “bullied” mentality on others. We have a community that can debate politics, religion, sexuality, and still jump in a game afterwards and play as friends. Why you might ask? Because we all have a common love; gaming. That love mediates us to have educated, mature discussions/debates, rather than just acting out our childhoods times 50. We all understand that even taking a step back from the “in your face” derogatory comments and looking at the micro level of “push and pull” baiting, “sarcasm”, and joking at anothers expense, no matter how big or small, when multiplied by numerous times in a day, week, month, hour... can make someone just no longer enjoy being around you. We are a culture that expresses love with a big giant “Fuck You”. I feel we are better than that.


Which if read after reading the Community Guidelines prior to apping:


ZERO TOLERANCE POLICY:

There are very few things that we do not tolerate in this community. We all joke around and we enjoy our good company (you guys). Sadly, every now and again we must alter our procedures in order to keep order in the community. We only have a few rules that will result in, not only immediate expulsion from the community but will also make us sad pandas.

1. Any racist slurs or incredibly insulting comments referencing sexual orientation or other sensitive issues towards another community member or general player in any games that we play while representing AltTabMe, or even just in general. Yes, some of us joke around but there is always a boundary that should never be crossed. If you are repeatedly offended after asking someone to chill or knock it off, LET AN OFFICER KNOW. We will handle any situation accordingly.

There are certain terms we would like you not to use but understand they are ingrained into the gaming mentality: (KITTEN, Fag, Gay. While we understand we don't want to censor you, we would also ask you to be considerate of these words in particular as they just don't need to be how we portray ourselves.)

Seems to be saying nothing new. If anything it gives everyone a bigger in depth reasoning for the way we are trying to be here.

No where does it say "If you say anything above you will be banned, removed, or kicked", it does however say we ask you to do your best to be above this kind of derogatory approach.

But come on we are not stupid. We knew people were not understanding exactly where it was coming from and just cringing at times and accepting it, so this article included reference to the community to give a better understanding. An attempt at further transparency for those with questions.

I am actually really surprised at the reaction to this article thus far. Not because people have different opinions but because it seems like not everyone agrees that being kinder to one another regardless of "thick skin" or "meaning of words" is in the benefit of everyone else. We are not blocking your opinions here, we are asking you to watch the words that have no actual reason to be in our vernacular when playing a game.

No where in this article is there a hidden agenda for homosexuals, this is as blatant as it can be: "We all PERSONALLY dislike the way these words have become part of our gaming culture as being OK and just as someone put it "exclamations". So we are handling our own shit and wish that those who want to be a part of this community try their best to make a slight adjustment as well.

We aren't taking away anyone's personality, opinions, or ideals.

Take responsibility for yourself. That is how change happens.

Now to address everything that went off topic:

Fen, if there are things that you feel are not right or being misconstrewed, you can bring it up to any of us. We can then have a conversation about it, figure out where we fucked up, and hopefully fix it. We all make mistakes, slip ups, and the like: THAT is what is meant when we say "it is supposed to be a community that we are constantly told is about the people and that the leaders are just "one of us." "

Now to the second part of that sentence:
So why can we not be included in the dialogs?

What do you call this? Is this not an open dialogue? Of course we will have things we discuss on our own, that is what a group of leaders does. But we bring everything we discuss to the table in a format that can be discussed. Doesn't mean we have to follow it, that is also our prerogative. To make the final call. And that works, not everyone wants to be in the entire mix and to be honest if everyone was included in every decision it would not longer be a place for you to just kick back and enjoy. You are all members of a community. Now I will always put this out there for those who wish to have more say in these kinds of things, those who put forth effort to really do what it takes to be a moderator/officer of this site are usually put into a position where that will be the case. We reward that effort. Of course we expect people to step up in lue of officers as well, as we are a mature self sustaining community, but we can tell the difference between a 1 time event and a true leadership ability. Moving on.


In a world based on words, I.E. The Internet the statement "Your actions show your true character, not your use or non-use of random no-no words." is not as solid as it would be otherwise. Because my actions in a gaming community consist of headshots, finishing moves, and magic spells. What does that say about me? Words hold a lot of weight online, people are just coming to the realization that as the internet becomes more ingrained into what we do, the more visible it makes our words, and the more we are going to be held accountable for them.


I never finished school because my father would not tolerate me having gay roommates and I wouldn't back down. That was idiotic of me. My father was being a close-minded bigot but it cost me my education for no reason. Taking the morale high ground hurt me far more than it hurt him. I discovered something else.

While I truly feel bad for that situation and how it turned out, when has taking a stand for something right against someone who is a bigot ever been easy? As well, it is our responsibility to decide how far we will fight for someone before we no longer want to fight. It looks like you went past your own comfort level. It is like good vs evil. You follow "rules" and they sucker punch you. Not fair, but ya know what, it is about how you want to feel at the end of the day. You give a VERY extreme circumstance here, one that will not happen at AltTabMe, one that could be more compared to say Malcolm X standing up for his beliefs and then getting killed for it. While I am in NO way saying any of us are that brave or monumental in what is happening here, I am saying that you either are ready for the bullet or you are not. We are not trying to put anyone in a situation where they need to take a bullet. We are just explaining how we will act and what we expect from others, and we take it from there. So ultimately I feel like that example does more to glorify what we are doing then


Being idealistic can be exhausting.

You got that right. I am tired a lot but I got re-invigorated when I realized I didn't need to be the cynic looking at people's tendency to give up on things too easy or give in to comfort, because ultimately I just needed to adjust myself to effect and attract those around me. So for me idealism is no longer a chore, but a way to enjoy the world around me.


itemizing DOs and DON'Ts

No one is itemizing anything. This article was about a bigger idea than that. It was also an explanation of why we do what we do. People often have questions, so we provide answers.


Are you truly respecting women or simply trying to put on a show and respect them enough publicly that you can say you do? I assure you that no intelligent woman will look at that boobies thread and think that men are appreciating the aesthetic beauty of the female form without thinking about shoving things in various orifices. Nor do we blame you. When you start mandating behavior, you're going to be placed under a microscope.



I think two of my ideas got melded in my response: 1. Pushing it with women by having that thread. 2. Keeping it civil. One is not related to the other. Sorry if they came off as the same thing. We are not pigs here, and there is no reason to act like one, women around or not.

What do you think is more offensive to me and every other self respecting female who games? Someone making a dick sucking comment or you as leaders saying that there aren't enough tits in the podcasts to bring in views? Do you think that somehow having a semi-private thread with a warning on it and removing any explicit references to sex somehow makes up for your intention to exploit a woman to promote your community? Be consistent or shut up. You cannot possibly offend me by making sexual comments. Go ahead, try. Your actions show your true character, not your use or non-use of random no-no words.

Sigh, because I know this part is going to be taken so far out of context... to be honest is already has been. Gyoin made a poor choice of words in mumble. I was there I believe. This is part of the "we too make mistakes" part. Now, to Gyoin's defense, he also told the entire chat box to stfu when they started going after someone when they signed up and it was shown that they were a girl. He made an off color comment, but as we do with everyone here, we don't judge on one moment in time, we look at them as wholes. This is why we don't just have applications. We have applications pre-req'd with participation on the forums, introductions, and the like. We like a bigger picture, which you, to prove a point, are narrowing the looking glass onto one sentence, which was, if I remember correctly apologized for EVEN after it was said. And if I remember correctly, I also went into him for it, because I was the person who recruited said person, and I didn't even know they liked Podcasting prior to talking to them. It was a bonus and something we were willing to work on with them to get them up to par with what we consider a person ready to be on our podcasts. Sure it is a bonus they are a girl, but actually in reality if a girl isn't on their game 100 times more than guy they get eaten up harder than a guy in a "YouTube" scenario. We have expectations of those who join us in podcasts and put a lot of effort into teaching, helping, and prepping. I swear I even said some of this.

Once again though the point is being missed, it isn't about trying to offend someone, it is about TRYING not to. A much harder feat if you ask me.

It takes more work to be nice than it does to be a jackass throwing all caution to the wind, and hoping the shit doesn't stick and if it does, hoping they have a towel.



If you say things privately that you wouldn't say or at least defend publicly, then you're a hypocrite. Methods matter. It's not only the end result, or what shows up on the home page of your site that shows the world who you are.


Everything I say privately I will say publicly. I suppose that might be part of the problem sometimes haha. Where there are consistency issues, we rely on the community to come to us to tell us, not hold it all in and explode. The reason this article is on the front page is because it is an article we want out there for people to see, not to give it more water. I dunno if you have noticed in your time here, but we post articles about a whole slew of different topics. All Rants show up on the front page as well, so I guess all those topics we disagree with that are on the front page are part of this "show the world who we are" tactic? Come on now...

Are the standards by which you choose and accept women the same as for men?

Yes. Shit sometimes they are a little stricter because we don't want to get into a situation where someone uses their looks or sexuality to game the system. They exist and we have had them.. Shit where is that app.... It is in there somewhere.

We have always had a very equal percentage of women to male applicants and members compared to many communities. Right now not so much as there have been break ups and the like which cause the obvious fall outs.

Now SKILLSETS, we do give some priority over if we are in need of something in the community and we may work with someone more behind the scenes to make sure they understand the community, the process, and the like more. This makes sense. A community sometimes needs specific people for specific tasks.


Last note, posts are never deleted forever, they are hidden. They are only hidden if reported by members. And while we agree this community is strong and can self police itself so to say, there are times where in the sections like "rants" people go personal or people go so off topic it takes away from the OP, so we remove it or move it to a new topic.

That being said, sure we can tone down a bit on it and see how it plays out :) Why the hell not. Although remember this is not our first rodeo and what you see is a product of what we have seen as well. That being said, maybe people can step up to the plate, without making others feel like shit.

The internet is full of porn. No one will be deprived if we don't host it here.

Obviously, I've never said anything about the thread before because I personally am comfortable with just ignoring its existence. I'm sharing this now because it seems like there's a desire here for Alttabme to be in a higher class of communities.

This was a great suggestion and sadly we are going to lose 4 achievements by removing these but I agree. Please PLEASE PLEASE everyone make suggestions like this before you go way off topic on a different post. We have a feedback section and are always reachable via PMS and can have polls and open it up for discussion on the site as well.


OVERALL I want to say: This topic is soo off topic at this point I am having trouble even following the train of thought. I am 100% happy we posted this though, because some great points have been made, I only wish you all would not wait till it bottles up and tell us sooner, but hey it happens. That being said, we learn everyday as you all do. And we actually do, contrary to being: http://alttabme.com/forum/index.php...t-neo-nazi-oppressive-forum-of-fuck-you.3185/ we actually care a whole lot and listen.

"Lead by example", I get it. I do it all the time at work, in life, in general. But I also know how much you have to distance yourself from the ones you wish you could shoot the shit with in situations like that in RL. Here we are trying something different. It may or may not work, it is still to be seen completely, but in the past it has worked out great. Obviously there are a lot of new people now. However we will not be Leading in a sense that limits us from being ourselves, regardless of the outcome for the time being, because THEN we have to treat this place as a job rather than a place to have fun. I think ultimately everyone who is in a leadership position here would prefer to have a place where FUN was priority for EVERYONE including the leaders then have to distance one another to have that "Impact" or "manipulation" factor associated with borders and distances. I don't want to have to be the "Silent only talks when it is important, so fear my words" leader. Gyoin doesn't want to be the "can't fuck around so when he does fuck around you all get thrown off guard" leader. We are not directing you or herding you to a role or a specific way of acting, so there is no reason for that level of separation when it comes to interactions. When it comes to ultimate decisions it will be there to an extent, but when it comes to us playing along side our buddies we REFUSE to succumb to it. And that will take work FROM EVERYONE.


 
And regardless of the debate about the boobies thread, or women on the podcast, or any of the other tangents in this thread, shouldn't people try to make a stand against hateful words like gay and retard? Don't forget that is the original message of this thread.


Why yes, yes we should so with an on topic post: I am loving hearing the difference between cultures with insults and that kind of interaction. In America we aim to kill a lot more than other places where insults are not as "this is it deal with it or fuck you". The general interaction of say two Italians or two swedes versus two Americans is so night and day it is scary. I love the open form of communication overseas to a certain extent of where obviously. This alone makes "hot" words less invasive. But in America where emotions are bottled then boiled then exploded the implications of simpler things is exacerbated by a who metric shit ton.
 
Here is a great example of things you shouldn't have to deal with. This is not friendship:

 
Conversations evolve as you talk. I don't think it's odd at all that a thread can get a bit off topic.

Personally, I don't use the terms fag and gay as casual slang because I find it to be an ignorant form of speech. If I want to call some one stupid, I'll say they are stupid. If I want to call someone a homosexual, then I'll call them gay. I'm not sure why that is considered an insult anymore, the public stigma is all but gone. If I called a heterosexual person gay in an effort to insult them, that just makes me look stupid.

E peen fights, like the one posted above are pointless. Time to get new friends, simple and clear.
 
Look an article with the same intent: http://www.ihatemmorpgs.com/2013/06/its-not-games-its-gamers.html

It's Not The Games, It's The Gamers.


future-asshole_zpsf9838cab.jpg

The types of MMORPG's we loved are gone forever.

Remember when online communities weren't wrought with dipshits and online games were fun and unique despite their imperfections? If so, you're probably 27 or older. In the post-Warcraft world, high-speed internet and gaming computers are now commonplace, and the original tard-filters that prevented "console gamers" from integrating with the Glorious PC Gaming Master Race have all but disintegrated. Despite what logic might seem to dictate, it seems that the thing that may end up destroying all hope for future MMORPG's is success.

Anyone who remembers the initial launches of gems like Ultima Online, Everquest, or Asheron's Call probably gets warm fuzzies when thinking about all the great experiences they've had with random strangers they met in the game. Back then, players were courteous and mature with the exception of a few outliers who had their part to play as villains in the game. The 90/10 friendly to dick ratio was perfect and allowed for games to be more hardcore since people largely didn't attempt to abuse the sandbox framework.

The ratio now is closer to 50/50 at best, with some games edging closer to 30/70. Game developers have taken notice of these ratios and are imposing strict regulations on your gaming experiences to curb the vicious nature of dick-gamers who have swarmed the internet. In order to remain profitable, a majority of subscribers must come away each day with a positive experience, and because an enriching community can no longer exist, the only way to ensure happiness is by pussifying everything.

Games that took the obvious approach of limiting who you can fuck with, a la WoW turned out some of the most immature sociopaths in history, while Darkfall, which by all accounts was one of the more 'hardcore' MMORPGs has resorted to safe-zones rather than allowing their rabid subscriber-base to chase away all comers who don't enjoy being tea-bagged repeatedly by twitchy virgins. My suspicion is that the restrictions actually cause more players to look outside the box in order to try and genuinely hurt other human-beings. It's madness.
EvE Online - The Ugly Exception

There has only been one remotely hardcore MMORPG that has achieved marginal success. I suspect that the way they've diluted the jackass-pool is by creating a game that is in itself an IQ (or patience) test. EvE Online's menu-diarrhea is their most profound shortcoming as well as their greatest asset. By creating a game that isn't very fun and is extremely complicated, they've prevented the typical rabble from thriving and multiplying which has helped them to sustain a large community of dedicated weirdos.

I'd hate to think that the only way to build a strong community is by creating a horrible game that isn't fun, but every hardcore game combined isn't 1/10th of EvE's subscribership. The only way that we're ever going to start seeing the types of quality MMORPG's that we has missed for all these years is by changing the global asshole-culture... or maybe MMO developers should publish people's street addresses.

Get it together, industry.

I do like this guy, his interviews are very well done and he is a former UO guy like me. There is something about that generation, probably because it is mine, haha, that makes me warm and fuzzy.[DOUBLEPOST=1374817570,1374817509][/DOUBLEPOST]
I'm not sure why that is considered an insult anymore, the public stigma is all but gone. If I called a heterosexual person gay in an effort to insult them, that just makes me look stupid.


Change is hard. I would also say the public stigma is not gone. Different maybe, but not gone.

Source: http://thoughtcatalog.com/2013/10-things-most-americans-dont-know-about-america/
10. WE MISTAKE COMFORT FOR HAPPINESS

The United States is a country built on the exaltation of economic growth and personal ingenuity. Small businesses and constant growth are celebrated and supported above all else — above affordable health care, above respectable education, above everything. Americans believe it’s your responsibility to take care of yourself and make something of yourself, not the state’s, not your community’s, not even your friend’s or family’s in some instances.

Comfort sells easier than happiness. Comfort is easy. It requires no effort and no work. Happiness takes effort. It requires being proactive, confronting fears, facing difficult situations, and having unpleasant conversations.
Comfort equals sales. We’ve been sold comfort for generations and for generations we bought: bigger houses, separated further and further out into the suburbs; bigger TV’s, more movies, and take-out. The American public is becoming docile and complacent. We’re obese and entitled. When we travel, we look for giant hotels that will insulate us and pamper us rather than for legitimate cultural experiences that may challenge our perspectives or help us grow as individuals.

Depression and anxiety disorders are soaring within the US. Our inability to confront anything unpleasant around us has not only created a national sense of entitlement, but it’s disconnected us from what actually drives happiness: relationships, unique experiences, feeling self-validated, achieving personal goals. It’s easier to watch a NASCAR race on television and tweet about it than to actually get out and try something new with a friend.

Unfortunately, a by-product of our massive commercial success is that we’re able to avoid the necessary emotional struggles of life in lieu of easy superficial pleasures.
 
Here's an article about a teen being arrested for smack talking.

(CNN) -- A Texas teen who's been jailed more than four months for a Facebook comment he made during a video-game argument is finally getting a day in court that could let him go home.
Justin Carter, who was 18 when he was arrested, will appear in Comal County (Texas) District Court on Tuesday, July 16, for a bond hearing, according to his lawyer, Don Flanary.
Flanary told CNN he will argue to have Carter's $500,000 bond, which his family cannot afford to cover, reduced.
Flanary, who is working the case for free, met with Carter for the first time on Tuesday. He said Carter is not doing well, and his family says he has been placed on suicide watch.


"Justin is in bad shape and has suffered quite a bit of abuse while in jail," Flanary said in an e-mail. "We will likely bring out these issues at the bond hearing."
He did not elaborate on the type of abuse claimed by Carter, who is now 19.
In February, Carter and a friend were arguing on Facebook with someone else over the online video game "League of Legends."
His father told CNN that the other gamer called Justin crazy and his son responded with sarcasm.
According to court documents, Justin wrote, "I'm f***ed in the head alright. I think I'ma (sic) shoot up a kindergarten and watch the blood of the innocent rain down and eat the beating heart of one of them."
Jack Carter said his son followed the claim with "LOL" and "J/K" -- indicating that the comment wasn't serious.
Authorities say someone reported the comment -- which came about two months after the killings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut -- and Justin Carter was arrested February 21 on a charge of making terroristic threats. In Texas, that's a felony that carries a sentence of up to eight years in prison.
Police originally thought Carter lived with his father in Austin, Texas, at a home the arrest report says is 100 yards from a school. They later learned he was living in New Braunfels, between Austin and San Antonio.
The Austin Police Department declined to provide CNN with additional documents related to the case. The Comal County District Attorney's office, which is prosecuting the case, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Carter's case has stirred support online.
A Change.org petition by his mother, calling for his release, had received more than 43,000 digital signatures as of Wednesday morning.
"Justin's a good kid," Jennifer Carter wrote on the petition. "He wouldn't hurt anyone, let alone a child."
She wrote that he has been "assaulted a number of times" in jail and that no weapons were found during a search of his home.
The American Civil Liberties Union tells CNN it is monitoring the case.
"We are all concerned about safety in our schools, but that's not what is at issue here," said Rebecca L. Robertson, legal and policy director for the ACLU of Texas. "The First Amendment protects a person's speech -- even speech that is in poor taste -- as long as it is not a true threat.
"Justin's online comment might have been distasteful and thoughtless. But, if the facts as reported are true, his comment is an objectionable joke rather than an actual threat, in which case the Comal County District Attorney is prosecuting protected speech. That's a dangerous precedent."
 
Yeah I saw that one awhile ago. The intention of teaching someone to watch their words is there, the execution of this discipline is WAY FUCKING wrong. They went nuts with this kid, putting him in JAIL is crazy. What a fiasco.

It only shows that people are taking what is said online more seriously, but what a giant fuck up this was by the judiciary system.
 
Here's an article about a teen being arrested for smack talking.

(CNN) -- A Texas teen who's been jailed more than four months for a Facebook comment he made during a video-game argument is finally getting a day in court that could let him go home.
Justin Carter, who was 18 when he was arrested, will appear in Comal County (Texas) District Court on Tuesday, July 16, for a bond hearing, according to his lawyer, Don Flanary.
Flanary told CNN he will argue to have Carter's $500,000 bond, which his family cannot afford to cover, reduced.
Flanary, who is working the case for free, met with Carter for the first time on Tuesday. He said Carter is not doing well, and his family says he has been placed on suicide watch.


"Justin is in bad shape and has suffered quite a bit of abuse while in jail," Flanary said in an e-mail. "We will likely bring out these issues at the bond hearing."
He did not elaborate on the type of abuse claimed by Carter, who is now 19.
In February, Carter and a friend were arguing on Facebook with someone else over the online video game "League of Legends."
His father told CNN that the other gamer called Justin crazy and his son responded with sarcasm.
According to court documents, Justin wrote, "I'm f***ed in the head alright. I think I'ma (sic) shoot up a kindergarten and watch the blood of the innocent rain down and eat the beating heart of one of them."
Jack Carter said his son followed the claim with "LOL" and "J/K" -- indicating that the comment wasn't serious.
Authorities say someone reported the comment -- which came about two months after the killings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut -- and Justin Carter was arrested February 21 on a charge of making terroristic threats. In Texas, that's a felony that carries a sentence of up to eight years in prison.
Police originally thought Carter lived with his father in Austin, Texas, at a home the arrest report says is 100 yards from a school. They later learned he was living in New Braunfels, between Austin and San Antonio.
The Austin Police Department declined to provide CNN with additional documents related to the case. The Comal County District Attorney's office, which is prosecuting the case, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Carter's case has stirred support online.
A Change.org petition by his mother, calling for his release, had received more than 43,000 digital signatures as of Wednesday morning.
"Justin's a good kid," Jennifer Carter wrote on the petition. "He wouldn't hurt anyone, let alone a child."
She wrote that he has been "assaulted a number of times" in jail and that no weapons were found during a search of his home.
The American Civil Liberties Union tells CNN it is monitoring the case.
"We are all concerned about safety in our schools, but that's not what is at issue here," said Rebecca L. Robertson, legal and policy director for the ACLU of Texas. "The First Amendment protects a person's speech -- even speech that is in poor taste -- as long as it is not a true threat.
"Justin's online comment might have been distasteful and thoughtless. But, if the facts as reported are true, his comment is an objectionable joke rather than an actual threat, in which case the Comal County District Attorney is prosecuting protected speech. That's a dangerous precedent."


If he would have been put into jail for one day as a warning, this would have been fine. But putting him into solitary confinement without a trial is not right.
 
They put him in "GENERAL POPULATION" where he was beaten and rap3d. (I'm dogeing the auto block for this cause people have to know) They moved him into solitary to keep him safe. at which point he began trying to kill himself. EVERYTHING IS WRONG ABOUT THIS.
... fuck.
 
I don't have the iron stomach that most people do here on the site, but if you don't feel a bit sick after hearing something like that, I don't know what I can say to you.
 
I'm waiting for the civil suit after this whole mess that bankrupts Texas


That's what I was thinking. I feel like after he is released there will be a major suit for 4 months+ of his life gone and all of these other events from inside.
 
It's really fucked IMO. If the kid wasn't going to kill someone he might now. That is life changing shit right there.
 
It only shows that people are taking what is said online more seriously, but what a giant fuck up this was by the judiciary system.

No, it shows that people are hysterically reacting without applying objectivity and intelligence before rendering judgement. It's the same as expelling a student from school for bringing a butter knife or an aspirin, albeit with a much more horrific outcome. Zero tolerance has become a bullshit term used as an excuse to govern lazily. There is so much fear mongering that everyone is terrified to think for themselves. We're afraid NOT to punish people who probably aren't guilty of anything because we are terrified of feeling responsible if they turn out to truly be a maniacal psychopath. No one wants to get involved. They don't want to actually talk to the offender to find out their true intentions. We just pass it on up the line to the authority higher than us so we can feel absolved and go back to our privileged high horse.

Maybe instead of running to the authorities, banning certain language, or building gated communities sanitized of all ugliness, we should be developing relationships and diving headfirst into communities where hate speech occurs, trying to affect change on an individual basis. Do we know who reported the kid for his comment? I'd bet it wasn't some concerned citizen initially, it was probably another punk who knew that people would freak the fuck out over what he said if they heard it out of context. I guarantee that the person he was speaking to knew it was sarcasm. The way it was said, in context, shows that the kid himself knew how screwed up the sentiment was, which is why he said it. He was using inflammatory language to make his point, something that a lot of us do very frequently.

It's a sad state of affairs that the words we say have more weight than the intention and meaning behind them and the context in which they are are used. I am concerned about people who hate - not people who say hateful things. There is some overlap between those 2 groups, but it's likely a lot smaller than most people think.[DOUBLEPOST=1374871762,1374871720][/DOUBLEPOST]
It's really fucked IMO. If the kid wasn't going to kill someone he might now. That is life changing shit right there.

This is true. There is no civil award high enough to undo the damage that has been done to the kid at this point. I hope he can recover.
 
I think most reasonable people would agree that the punishment is way inconsistent with the crime. The timing (just after Sandy Hook) is unfortunate. The kid got caught up in a perfect storm of irrational fear and officials trying to look like they were doing something.

But you know what? He might not say stupid stuff on social media anymore.
 
Top Bottom